skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"I really think most of what we call cinema is not cinema. It's really
film theatre or, even worse, illustrated literature. The object of the
film is the story and the characters are just technical people
representing something. Most cinema is comic books. In my opinion that
is not real cinema. Real cinema is much closer to music. Music doesn't
represent anything, it is just something that will convey feeling. It
doesn't mean anything. I hate the idea that film is actually telling a
story! The great part of film is to make you feel, not by the narrative.
For example the first shot of "Silent Light" is cinematic. The light
itself is beautiful. In literature, that does not exist. You can just
write, "The sun came up." The beauty in my film is the sun itself. You
don't have to recreate it. In cinema, the story and the photography are
the same thing. It's not like, "I don't like the story, but great
photography." The photography is the film itself; it's not a vehicle for
the story. I don't want a story and then you illustrate it, in a way
that there will always be a division between form and meaning. I think
in art, form and meaning are the same thing. In that sense, music is the
most noble of arts, because it does not permit you to separate the
music from the meaning. When cinema is true, it is a language in itself -
that is why it is an art. I hate the idea that a good film is a good
story, as Hollywood people say. That's not letting cinema be totally
free."
Carlos Reygadas
1 comment:
Too true Mr Reygadas......and Mr Graham. Those that choose to dream will be delivered to the coalescence of form and meaning. All power to the dreamers.
Post a Comment